Representation of intentions: persisting activation in memory.
Abstract
In 4 experiments we investigated dynamic properties of representations of intentions. After Ss had memorized 2 texts describing simple activities, they were instructed that they would have to later execute one of the scripts. On an intervening recognition test, words from the to-be-executed script produced faster latencies than did words from a second to-be-memorized script. This intention-superiority effect was obtained even when (a) selective encoding and poststudy imagery or rehearsal of the to-be-executed script was prohibited and (b) subjects expected a final free-recall test for both scripts. In a control condition in which subjects had to observe someone else executing a script, latencies for words from the to-be-observed script did not differ from neutral words
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Level 2 cognition is capable of forming goals and intentions that are maintained over longer periods of time.
“Consequently, Level 2 cognition is capable of forming goals and intentions that are maintained over longer periods of time (Goschke and Kuhl, 1993).”
From Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance (2016) · cites this paper as Goschke and Kuhl, 1993
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 71 · Cited by 503
- Authors
- Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J.
- Affiliations
- Osnabrück University (DE)
- ORCID
- Goschke, Thomas
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1211-1226
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W1994566358
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- memory activation, recognition memory, free recall, selective encoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
