Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective
Abstract
This research was an investigation of children's performance on a task that requires memory binding. In Experiments 1 and 2, 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and adults viewed complex pictures and were tested on memory for isolated parts in the pictures and on the part combinations (combination condition). The results suggested improvement in memory for the combinations between the ages of 4 and 6 years but not in memory for the isolated parts. In Experiments 2 and 3, the authors also examined the developmental relationship between performance in the combination condition and free recall of a naturalistic event, finding preliminary evidence that performance on a memory task that requires binding is positively related to performance in episodic memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Memory for individual items develops much earlier than item-context or item-item relational memory.
“These patterns align with previous findings that memory for individual items develops much earlier than item-context or item-item relational memory 12,18.”
From Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Sluzenski, J., Newcombe, N. S., & Kovacs, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Newcombe, Nora S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2029575412
- Semantic Scholar
- a5431abd6b49619a8a39428e1e721abb6fa5754c
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory binding, relational memory, episodic memory, free recall, children's memory development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Color Perception, Depth Perception, Discrimination Learning, Female, Field Dependence-Independence, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
