The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice.
Abstract
This survey investigated psychologists' use of outcome measures in clinical practice. Of the respondents, 37% indicated that they used some form of outcome assessment in practice. A wide variety of measures were used thatwere rated by the client or clinician. Clinicians who assess outcome in practice are more likely to be younger, have a cognitive-behavioral orientation, conduct more hours of therapy per week, provide services for children and adolescents, and work in institutional settings. Clinicians who do not use outcome measures endorse practical (e.g., cost, time) and philosophical (e.g., relevance) barriers to their use. Both users and nonusers of outcome measures were interested in similar types of information, including client progress since entering treatment, current strengths and weaknesses, and determining if there is a need to alter treatment. Implications for practicing clinicians are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, MBC is underutilized in mental health and substance use treatment (15, 20).”
From Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982 · cited 1×
“Several well-known instruments were often used such as the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck et al., 1961), the Global Assessment Scale ( Endicott, Spitzer, Fleiss, & Cohen, 1976 ), the Symptom Checklist–90 (Derogatis, 1983), and the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, 1991).”
MethodMMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. (1989) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · Cited by 2,450
Lr, D., & Derogatis, L. R. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,027
The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment
Maruish, M. E., & Leahy, R. L. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.14.2.205 · Cited by 1,634
The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment
(2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410610614 · Cited by 1,503
Research Methods in Family Therapy
Tiesel, J. W., Sprenkle, D. H., & Moon, S. M. (1999) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353770 · Cited by 661
Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress.
Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.10.1059 · Cited by 573
Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/713663852 · Cited by 433
Assessing outcome in clinical practice
Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. S. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 189
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Achenbach, 1991, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 ana' 1991 profile.
- Derogatis, 1983, SCL-90: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual for the revised version.
- Geraty, 1996, The use of outcomes assessment in managed care: Past, present, and future., 129
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure.
Hannan, C. R., Lambert, M., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20108 · Cited by 550
Hunsley, J. D., & Mash, E. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419 · Cited by 563
Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions
Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696 · Cited by 494
Lambert, M. (2007) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300601032506 · Cited by 461
Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Frye, A. A., Ng, M. Y., Lau, N., Bearman, S. K., Ugueto, A. M., Langer, D. A., & Hoagwood, K. (2011) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023307 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- ORCID
- Ogles, Benjamin M.
- Venue
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 485-491
- ISSN
- 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2038869957
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- outcome measures, outcome measurement, psychologists, clinical practice, treatment evaluation, cognitive behavioral therapy, institutional environment, children and adolescents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
