Work Setting and Burnout Among Professional Psychologists.
Abstract
How does work setting relate to burnout among professional psychologists? Five hundred and seventy-one doctoral psychologists responded to a survey about professional activities, work environment, and burnout. Solo and group independent practitioners reported a greater sense of personal accomplishment than agency respondents. However, women experienced higher levels of emotional exhaustion in agency settings than in either solo or group independent practice, whereas men experienced higher exhaustion in group independent practice. Overall, greater emotional exhaustion was associated with less control over work activities, working more hours, spending more time on administrative tasks and paperwork, seeing more managed care clients and fewer direct pay clients, and having to deal with more negative client behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Occupational stress and burnout are common among healthcare professionals.
“Occupational stress and burnout are common amongst different HCPs, including nurses, physicians and psychologists (Rupert and Morgan 2005; Shanafelt et al. 2003; Vahey et al. 2004).”
From The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Psychological Functioning of Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Rupert and Morgan 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 249
- Authors
- Rupert, P. A., & Morgan, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 544-550
- ISSN
- 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2017267371
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- burnout, professional psychologists, work environment, emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, independent practice, gender differences, job control, managed care, administrative workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
