Cited by 25Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Cognitive decline and human (Homo sapiens) aging: An investigation using a comparative neuropsychological approach

Boutet, Isabelle, Milgram, Norton W., Freedman, Morris·2007·Journal of comparative psychology

Abstract

Using a comparative neuropsychological approach, the authors compared performance of younger and healthy older adults ages 65 and over on tasks originally developed to measure cognition in animals. A battery of 6 tasks was used to evaluate object discrimination, egocentric spatial abilities, visual and spatial working memory, and response shifting. Older adults performed more poorly than younger adults on tasks that evaluate egocentric spatial abilities, response shifting, and to a lesser extent object recognition. The two groups did not differ for tasks that evaluate spatial working memory and object discrimination. The impairments the authors observed in tasks that evaluate response shifting and object recognition are consistent with those found in canines and primates as well as those found in Alzheimer's disease. The results are consistent with the notion that cognitive processes supported by the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex are among the first to decline with increasing age in both humans and animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7036.121.3.270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous literature highlights the negative effects of age on spatial abilities, memory, attention, and perceptual speed.

    “Previous literature highlights the negative effects of age on spatial abilities, memory, attention, and perceptual speed [19,27,75].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 25

Authors
Boutet, I., Milgram, N. W., & Freedman, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of comparative psychology
Published
2007-08
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
270-281
ISSN
  • 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2087
  • 0735-7036
OpenAlex
W2142043345
Cited by
25
References
83
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERCA7659)
  • Saul A. Silverman Family Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive aging, cognitive decline, older adults, object recognition, object discrimination, spatial working memory, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, Alzheimer's disease, animal cognition
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Discrimination Learning, Female, Group Processes, Health Status, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review