Analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations emitted by intruders during aggressive encounters among rats (Rattus norvegicus).
Abstract
This investigation was concerned with the extent to which aggressive resident rats emit 40-70-kHz vocalizations and the effect of these signals on intruders. In Experiment 1, deafened and intact intruder males were given two encounters with resident animals. Deafened intruders engaged in a higher duration of immobile or freezing postures than intact animals. Experiment 2 indicated that the augmentation of freezing found among deafened intruders was not due to an inability to detect ultrasounds made by residents since intruders encountering devocalized resident males showed no reliable differences in specific motor patterns from intruders paired with intact residents. The results further demonstrated that 40-70-kHz vocalizations are produced almost entirely by intruding animals since there were no significant changes in occurrence of these calls when resident males were devocalized. Under the constraints of the testing procedures employed, the role of ultrasonic communication during the initial formation of agonistic relations could not be determined experimentally.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling, while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator, are more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.
“Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling,20,25 while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator is more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.46”
From Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
Play-fighting or rough and tumble play is more closely associated with the emittance of 50 kHz calls.
“Conversely, play-fighting or “rough and tumble play” is more closely associated with the emittance of 50 kHz calls.5”
From Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 187
- Authors
- Thomas, D. A., Takahashi, L. K., & Barfield, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Thomas, David A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Published
- 1983
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-206
- ISSN
- 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2087
- 0735-7036
- OpenAlex
- W2146270830
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- ultrasonic vocalizations, deafness, freezing behavior, agonistic behavior, ultrasonic communication, Rattus norvegicus
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Deafness, Humans, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review