Cited by 187Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations emitted by intruders during aggressive encounters among rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Thomas, David A., Takahashi, Lorey K., Barfield, Ronald J.·1983·Journal of Comparative Psychology

Abstract

This investigation was concerned with the extent to which aggressive resident rats emit 40-70-kHz vocalizations and the effect of these signals on intruders. In Experiment 1, deafened and intact intruder males were given two encounters with resident animals. Deafened intruders engaged in a higher duration of immobile or freezing postures than intact animals. Experiment 2 indicated that the augmentation of freezing found among deafened intruders was not due to an inability to detect ultrasounds made by residents since intruders encountering devocalized resident males showed no reliable differences in specific motor patterns from intruders paired with intact residents. The results further demonstrated that 40-70-kHz vocalizations are produced almost entirely by intruding animals since there were no significant changes in occurrence of these calls when resident males were devocalized. Under the constraints of the testing procedures employed, the role of ultrasonic communication during the initial formation of agonistic relations could not be determined experimentally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7036.97.3.201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling, while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator, are more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.

    “Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling,20,25 while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator is more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.46”
  • Play-fighting or rough and tumble play is more closely associated with the emittance of 50 kHz calls.

    “Conversely, play-fighting or “rough and tumble play” is more closely associated with the emittance of 50 kHz calls.5”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 187

Authors
Thomas, D. A., Takahashi, L. K., & Barfield, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
1983
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
201-206
ISSN
  • 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2087
  • 0735-7036
OpenAlex
W2146270830
Cited by
187
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
ultrasonic vocalizations, deafness, freezing behavior, agonistic behavior, ultrasonic communication, Rattus norvegicus
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Deafness, Humans, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review