Cited by 357Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: Spatial memory and hyponeophagia.

Bannerman, D. M., Deacon, R. M. J., Offen, S., Friswell, J., Grubb, M., Rawlins, J. N. P.·2002·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Complete and dorsal hippocampal lesions impaired spatial performance on 2 working memory tasks: rewarded alternation on the T maze and matching to position in the water maze. In contrast, ventral hippocampal lesions had no effect on these tasks, even when task difficulty was increased by the introduction of delays. Ventral lesions did resemble complete lesions in reducing anxiety in 3 commonly used tests of anxiety (social interaction, plus-maze, and hyponeophagia). Dorsal lesions also appeared to be anxiolytic in the social interaction and plus-maze tests, but they did not affect hyponeophagia. Complete- and dorsal-lesioned rats displayed hyperactivity, whereas ventral-lesioned rats did not. These results show a double dissociation between dorsal and ventral hippocampal lesions (hyponeophagia vs. spatial memory), suggesting differentiation of function along the septotemporal axis of this structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.116.5.884

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ventral hippocampus, in contrast to the dorsal hippocampus, is thought to contribute to anxiety-related phenotypes and not spatial memory, per se.

    “these studies specifically target alterations in the ventral hippocampus, which in contrast to the dorsal hippocampus, is thought to contribute to anxiety-related phenotypes and not spatial memory, per se.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 357

Authors
Bannerman, D. M., Deacon, R. M. J., Offen, S., Friswell, J., Grubb, M., & Rawlins, J. N. P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2002
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
884-901
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2023745778
Cited by
357
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampus, dorsal hippocampus, ventral hippocampus, double dissociation, spatial memory, anxiety, working memory, T-maze, water maze, septotemporal axis, hyperactivity, hippocampal lesions
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Hyperphagia, Locomotion, Male, Memory, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Time Factors, N-Methylaspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review