Role of the Basal Ganglia in Category Learning: How Do Patients With Parkinson's Disease Learn?
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to gain a deeper understanding of the role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory by examining learning strategies among patients with basal ganglia dysfunction. Using a probabilistic category learning task (the "weather prediction" task) previously shown to be sensitive to basal ganglia function, the authors examined patterns of performance during learning and used mathematical models to capture different learning strategies. Results showed that patients with Parkinson's disease exhibit different patterns of strategy use. Specifically, most controls initially used a simple, but suboptimal, strategy that focused on single-cue-outcome associations; eventually, however, most controls adopted a more complex, optimal learning strategy, integrating single-cue associations to predict outcomes for multiple-cue stimuli. In contrast, the majority of individuals with Parkinson's disease continued to rely on simple single-cue learning strategies throughout the experiment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with compromised basal ganglia function due to Parkinson's Disease show a deficit in learning via trial and error feedback.
“This idea is supported by observations in patients with compromised basal ganglia function due to Parkinson's Disease, who show a deficit in learning via trial and error feedback 28.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 186
- Authors
- Shohamy, D., Myers, C. E., Onlaor, S., & Gluck, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 676-686
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- OpenAlex
- W2130545318
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- basal ganglia, category learning, probabilistic category learning, Parkinson's disease, learning strategies, weather prediction task, mathematical model of learning, basal ganglia dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Basal Ganglia, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Probability Learning, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review