Cited by 186Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Role of the Basal Ganglia in Category Learning: How Do Patients With Parkinson's Disease Learn?

Shohamy, D., Myers, C. E., Onlaor, S., Gluck, M. A.·2004·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to gain a deeper understanding of the role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory by examining learning strategies among patients with basal ganglia dysfunction. Using a probabilistic category learning task (the "weather prediction" task) previously shown to be sensitive to basal ganglia function, the authors examined patterns of performance during learning and used mathematical models to capture different learning strategies. Results showed that patients with Parkinson's disease exhibit different patterns of strategy use. Specifically, most controls initially used a simple, but suboptimal, strategy that focused on single-cue-outcome associations; eventually, however, most controls adopted a more complex, optimal learning strategy, integrating single-cue associations to predict outcomes for multiple-cue stimuli. In contrast, the majority of individuals with Parkinson's disease continued to rely on simple single-cue learning strategies throughout the experiment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with compromised basal ganglia function due to Parkinson's Disease show a deficit in learning via trial and error feedback.

    “This idea is supported by observations in patients with compromised basal ganglia function due to Parkinson's Disease, who show a deficit in learning via trial and error feedback 28.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 186

Authors
Shohamy, D., Myers, C. E., Onlaor, S., & Gluck, M. A.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2004-08
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
676-686
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2130545318
Cited by
186
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
basal ganglia, category learning, probabilistic category learning, Parkinson's disease, learning strategies, weather prediction task, mathematical model of learning, basal ganglia dysfunction
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Basal Ganglia, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Probability Learning, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review