Locus of control in aging research: A case for multidimensional and domain-specific assessment.
Abstract
Do locus of control beliefs change in later life? Is locus of control related to aging-relevant outcomes involving intelligence and health? In past research on these topics, the use of unidimensional and generalized measures of locus of control has led to a set of inconsistent findings. Three studies were conducted to examine the usefulness of multidimensional and domain-specific measures of locus of control for examining age differences and correlates. College students and elderly adults were compared on Levenson's multidimensional and generalized (internal, chance, and powerful others) locus of control scales and two domain-specific versions related to intelligence and health. As predicted, no age differences were found with generalized measures, but the elderly were more external on intelligence- and health-specific locus of control dimensions. Age differences were found most often on the chance and powerful others control dimensions, suggesting that the elderly acknowledge the importance of external sources of control and at the same time preserve their sense of internal control. In addition, the domain-specific scales were better predictors of behavioral outcomes within their respective domains for the elderly but not for the young. The findings suggest that multidimensional and domain-specific conceptions of control are advantageous for aging research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
General control scales typically show much lower correlations with specific behavior than domain-specific control beliefs do.
“these general control scales typically show much lower correlations with specific behavior than do domain-specific control beliefs (e.g., Lachman, 1986).”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Lachman, 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
The Life-Course Dynamics of Goal Pursuit and Goal Adjustment: A Two-Process Framework
Brandtstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2002) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.2001.0539 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Lachman, M. E., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013297 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationFiori, K. L., Brown, E. E., Cortina, K. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (2006) · Mental Health, Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13694670600615482 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lachman, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lachman, Margie E.
- ORCID
- Lachman, Margie E.
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-40
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W1980047644
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (RR0704415)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- locus of control, aging, age differences, chance locus of control, powerful others locus of control, internal locus of control, intelligence, older adults, university students
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Health, Humans, Intelligence, Internal-External Control, Male, Regression Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review