Cited by 368Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth and Wellbeing ResearchPersonality Traits and Psychology

Locus of control in aging research: A case for multidimensional and domain-specific assessment.

Lachman, Margie E.·1986·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Do locus of control beliefs change in later life? Is locus of control related to aging-relevant outcomes involving intelligence and health? In past research on these topics, the use of unidimensional and generalized measures of locus of control has led to a set of inconsistent findings. Three studies were conducted to examine the usefulness of multidimensional and domain-specific measures of locus of control for examining age differences and correlates. College students and elderly adults were compared on Levenson's multidimensional and generalized (internal, chance, and powerful others) locus of control scales and two domain-specific versions related to intelligence and health. As predicted, no age differences were found with generalized measures, but the elderly were more external on intelligence- and health-specific locus of control dimensions. Age differences were found most often on the chance and powerful others control dimensions, suggesting that the elderly acknowledge the importance of external sources of control and at the same time preserve their sense of internal control. In addition, the domain-specific scales were better predictors of behavioral outcomes within their respective domains for the elderly but not for the young. The findings suggest that multidimensional and domain-specific conceptions of control are advantageous for aging research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.1.1.34

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lachman, M. E.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Lachman, Margie E.
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1986
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
34-40
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W1980047644
Cited by
368
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR0704415)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
locus of control, aging, age differences, chance locus of control, powerful others locus of control, internal locus of control, intelligence, older adults, university students
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Health, Humans, Intelligence, Internal-External Control, Male, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review