Cited by 390Aging and Gerontology ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns.

Howard, James H., Howard, Darlene V.·1997·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

3 experiments examined serial pattern learning in younger and older adults. Unlike the usual repeating pattern, the sequences alternated between events from a repeating pattern and those determined randomly. The results indicated that no one was able to describe the regularity, but with practice every individual in all 3 age groups (including old old) became faster, more accurate, or both, on pattern trials than on random trials. Although this indicates that adults of all ages are able to learn second-order statistical dependencies in a sequence, age-related deficits were obtained in the magnitude of pattern learning. There were also age differences in what was learned, with only younger people revealing sensitivity to higher order statistical dependencies in the sequence. In addition, whereas younger people revealed evidence of their pattern learning in a subsequent conceptually driven production test, young-old and old-old people did not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.634

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V.
Affiliations
Catholic University of America (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1997
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
634-656
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2025539352
Cited by
390
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r37ag002751-16)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
implicit learning, serial pattern learning, age differences, older adults, production testing, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Concept Formation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Probability Learning, Serial Learning, Stochastic Processes, Unconscious, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review