Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: from striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses
Open accessAbstract
Using a multimethod approach, the authors conducted 4 studies to test life span hypotheses about goal orientations across adulthood. Confirming expectations, in Studies 1 and 2 younger adults reported a primary growth orientation in their goals, whereas older adults reported a stronger orientation toward maintenance and loss prevention. Orientation toward prevention of loss correlated negatively with well-being in younger adults. In older adults, orientation toward maintenance was positively associated with well-being. Studies 3 and 4 extend findings of a self-reported shift in goal orientation to the level of behavioral choice involving cognitive and physical fitness goals. Studies 3 and 4 also examine the role of expected resource demands. The shift in goal orientation is discussed as an adaptive mechanism to manage changing opportunities and constraints across adulthood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a shift in goals from growth, in young adulthood, to maintenance or prevention in older adulthood, and this shift is related to better well-being.
“They select new realistic goals that add purpose to life, and there is a shift in goals from growth, in young adulthood, to maintenance or prevention in older adulthood. This shift is related to better well-being (Ebner et al., 2006).”
From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Ebner et al., 2006
Goal orientation and selection appears to affect well-being, with goal orientation towards maintenance being associated with well-being in older adults.
“Goal orientation and selection appears to affect well-being with goal orientation towards maintenance being associated with well-being in older adults.(Ebner, Freund, and Baltes 2006)”
From Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults (2015) · cites this paper as Ebner et al. 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 764
- Authors
- Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 664-678
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2130975486
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 22.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- goal orientation, lifespan development, growth orientation, loss prevention, well-being, older adults, young adults, resource requirements
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Goals, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review