Cited by 39Aging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Visual function and cognitive aging: Differential role of contrast sensitivity in verbal versus spatial tasks.

Glass, Jennifer M.·2007·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Cognitive and sensory function are correlated in older adults. Sensory function may provide an index of neurological integrity (common-cause hypothesis). Declining sensory input may also directly impair cognition (direct-cause hypothesis). Accordingly, sensory function should more strongly predict cognitive performance and should account for more age-related variability in tasks with higher sensory demands. In a cross-sectional adult life span sample, visual contrast sensitivity was a better predictor and accounted for more of the age-related variability in high sensory-demand tasks, compared with low sensory-demand tasks, consistent with the direct-cause hypothesis. The results suggest a direct role for sensory function in cognitive aging when task conditions place heavy demands on sensory processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 39

Authors
Glass, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Glass, Jennifer M.
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2007-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
233-238
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2041041041
Cited by
39
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (1R03AG020792)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive aging, contrast sensitivity, sensory function, verbal tasks, spatial tasks, common cause hypothesis, older adults, age-related variation, visual function
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Size Perception, Speech Perception, Verbal Learning, Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review