A multilevel model analysis of expertise in chess across the life span.
Abstract
The authors examined longitudinal change in chess skill using a multilevel model analysis of a large database of active, elite chess players (N = 5,011). Parameters estimated from quadratic growth curves indicated that the age of peak performance occurs later in life than originally proposed and that this peak is independent of initial skill level. The findings are also consistent with the hypothesis that aging is slightly kinder to the initially more able, who show milder decline past their peak. Higher tournament activity levels predicted higher ratings overall and interacted with age in the initially more able sample, suggesting that activity had smaller effects on rating for older adults. The authors discuss implications of these findings for lifetime changes in skilled performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chess performance curves from continued play do not look like standard working-memory curves.
“maintenance of chess expertise through actively playing chess produces life-span curves of chess performance that do not resemble the curves for standard working-memory tasks”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Roring & Charness, 2007
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · see citing works
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,568 · see citing works
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
de Bruin, A. B. H., Smits, N., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712608x295631 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
The impact of domain-specific experience on chess skill: reanalysis of a key study.
Burgoyne, A. P., Nye, C. D., Macnamara, B. N., Charness, N., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2019) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.1.0027 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Roring, R. W., & Charness, N.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- ORCID
- Charness, Neil
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-299
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2004314610
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (1 PO1 AG17211-06)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- chess expertise, age of peak performance, chess rating, lifespan development
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Aptitude, Child, Competitive Behavior, Computer Graphics, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving, Models, Statistical, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review