The intergenerational transmission of relationship violence.
Abstract
This study explored the intergenerational transmission of violence in a community sample. A telephone survey of 1,249 adults in the City of Vancouver assessed family-of-origin violence (father to mother, mother to father, father to self, and mother to self), as well as physical and psychological abuse in intimate relationships. All forms of family-of-origin violence were predictive of all forms of relationship abuse, consistent with a general social learning model of relationship violence. There was no evidence of gender-specific or role-specific patterns of transmission. For example, father-to-mother violence was not specifically predictive of men's perpetration and women's victimization in adult relationships. Nor was parent-to-self violence more predictive of victimization than perpetration. The methodological and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three studies did not find significant statistical evidence to support the gender-specific hypothesis.
“Three studies, however, did not find significant statistical evidence to support the gender-specific hypothesis (Jung et al., 2019; Kwong et al., 2003; Menard et al., 2014).”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Kwong et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 284
- Authors
- Kwong, M. J., Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A. J. Z., & Trinke, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 288-301
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W2050652672
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- intergenerational transmission of violence, intimate partner violence, relationship violence, physical abuse, psychological violence, social learning model
- MeSH terms
- Adult, British Columbia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Intergenerational Relations, Domestic Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review