The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy in Marriage: A Daily-Diary and Multilevel Modeling Approach.
Abstract
This study used daily reports of interactions in marriage to examine predictions from the conceptualization of intimacy as the outcome of an interpersonal process. Both partners of 96 married couples completed daily diaries assessing self-disclosure, partner disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, and intimacy on each of 42 consecutive days. Multivariate multilevel modeling revealed that self-disclosure and partner disclosure both significantly and uniquely contributed to the contemporaneous prediction of intimacy. Perceived partner responsiveness partially mediated the effects of self-disclosure and partner disclosure on intimacy. Global marital satisfaction, relationship intimacy, and demand-withdraw communication were related to daily levels of intimacy. Implications for the importance of perceived partner responsiveness in the intimacy process for married partners are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many patients with chronic pain believe that others do not understand their pain or even consider their pain condition to be legitimate[9]”
From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Diener, E. (1984) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2 · Cited by 12,609
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
ФАКТОРЫ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО БЛАГОПОЛУЧИЯ ЛЮДЕЙ ПОЖИЛОГО ВОЗРАСТА
Р., Н. М., & Ю., Б. С. (2026) · CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,969
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,095
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry
Sullivan, H. S., Perry, H. S., Gawel, M. L., & Cohen, M. D. M. B. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315014029 · Cited by 5,280
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Derlega, 1993, Self-disclosure.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
- Laurenceau, 2004, Intimacy as an interpersonal process: Current status and future directions., 61
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review.
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031859 · Cited by 1,764
Chaudoir, S. R., & Fisher, J. D. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018193 · Cited by 1,058
Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context
Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42004-3 · Cited by 454
Using Diary Methods to Study Marital and Family Processes.
Laurenceau, J., & Bolger, N. P. (2005) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86 · Cited by 433
Self-citationDepression and everyday social activity, belonging, and well-being.
Steger, M. F., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015416 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 314-323
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W1985106592
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03mh058017-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1R03MH58017)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- marital intimacy, self-disclosure, partner disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, mediation, marital satisfaction, married couples
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Communication, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Self Disclosure, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
