Recollection- and familiarity-based memory in healthy aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
Abstract
Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms of the memory impairment associated with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). We explored recollection and familiarity in 27 healthy young adults, 45 healthy older adults, and 17 individuals with aMCI. Relative to the younger adults, recollection was reduced in the older adults, especially among those with aMCI. Familiarity did not differ among groups. In the healthy younger and older adults, better performance on a set of clinical memory measures that are sensitive to medial temporal lobe functioning was associated with greater recollection. In addition, among the healthy older adults better executive functioning was also associated with greater recollection. These results are consistent with the notion that recollection is a product of strategic processes mediated by the prefrontal cortex that suppport the retrieval of context-dependent memories from the hippocampus. Hippocampal atrophy associated with aMCI may disrupt this brain network, and thereby interfere with recollection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The l-dlPFC is integral to higher-order cognition and modulates episodic memory in MCI by enhancing encoding and facilitating retrieval.
“l-dlPFC is integral to higher-order cognition (i.e., executive function) [10,11], which modulates episodic memory in MCI by way of enhancing encoding and facilitating retrieval [12–14].”
From A phase I trial of accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS for amnestic MCI (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 83 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Anderson, N. D., Ebert, P. L., Jennings, J. M., Grady, C. L., Cabeza, R., & Graham, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Baycrest Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-187
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2015167727
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Alzheimer Society of Canada
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- recollection, familiarity, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, healthy aging, older adults, medial temporal lobe, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, executive function, memory retrieval, hippocampal atrophy, contextual memory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Amnesia, Anxiety, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psycholinguistics, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe, Vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review