Cited by 154Memory Processes and InfluencesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Recollection- and familiarity-based memory in healthy aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Anderson, Nicole D., Ebert, Patricia L., Jennings, Janine M., Grady, Cheryl L., Cabeza, Roberto, Graham, Simon J.·2008·Neuropsychology

Abstract

Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms of the memory impairment associated with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). We explored recollection and familiarity in 27 healthy young adults, 45 healthy older adults, and 17 individuals with aMCI. Relative to the younger adults, recollection was reduced in the older adults, especially among those with aMCI. Familiarity did not differ among groups. In the healthy younger and older adults, better performance on a set of clinical memory measures that are sensitive to medial temporal lobe functioning was associated with greater recollection. In addition, among the healthy older adults better executive functioning was also associated with greater recollection. These results are consistent with the notion that recollection is a product of strategic processes mediated by the prefrontal cortex that suppport the retrieval of context-dependent memories from the hippocampus. Hippocampal atrophy associated with aMCI may disrupt this brain network, and thereby interfere with recollection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0894-4105.22.2.177

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The l-dlPFC is integral to higher-order cognition and modulates episodic memory in MCI by enhancing encoding and facilitating retrieval.

    “l-dlPFC is integral to higher-order cognition (i.e., executive function) [10,11], which modulates episodic memory in MCI by way of enhancing encoding and facilitating retrieval [12–14].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 83 · Cited by 154

Authors
Anderson, N. D., Ebert, P. L., Jennings, J. M., Grady, C. L., Cabeza, R., & Graham, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Baycrest Hospital (CA)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2008-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
177-187
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2015167727
Cited by
154
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Alzheimer Society of Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recollection, familiarity, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, healthy aging, older adults, medial temporal lobe, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, executive function, memory retrieval, hippocampal atrophy, contextual memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Amnesia, Anxiety, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psycholinguistics, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review