Cited by 198Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter.

Gollob, Harry F., Reichardt, Charles S.·1991·Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10099-015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the most important features of longitudinal research designs is that they provide researchers with an opportunity to control for the influence of prior levels of the dependent variable, one of the most important 'third variable' confounds.

    “one of the most important features of longitudinal research designs is that they provide researchers with an opportunity to control for the influence of prior levels of the dependent variable; one of the most important 'third variable' confounds (Gollob & Reichardt, 1991).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 198

Authors
Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions.
Published
1991
Pages
243-259
OpenAlex
W2477822574
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
indirect effects, time delay, mediation analysis, lagged effects, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review