Knowledges.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The O*NET database provides ratings on a set of knowledge requirements for each occupation, where knowledge is defined as general categories of facts and principles necessary to complete occupational tasks.
“The O*NET database provides ratings on a set of knowledge requirements for each occupation, where knowledge is defined as general categories of facts and principles that are necessary to complete occupational tasks (Costanza et al., 1999).”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Costanza et al., 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 9
- Authors
- Costanza, D. P., Fleishman, E. A., & Marshall-Mies, J.
- ORCID
- Costanza, David P.
- Venue
- An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 71-90
- OpenAlex
- W4253083013
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
