The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review on the clinical applications of the Chinese MMPI.
Abstract
Twenty-six studies on the clinical applications of the Chinese version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) in China are reviewed
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Chinese version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) differentiated among individuals with schizophrenia, mania, depression, and neurosis in the same ways that the English MMPI does in the United States (Cheung & Song, 1989).”
From Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies (2006) · cites this paper as Cheung & Song, 1989
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies
Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., & Annus, A. M. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00013.x · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheung, F. M., & Song, W.-Z.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- ORCID
- Cheung, Fanny M.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 230-237
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2028047068
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- MMPI, personality assessment, clinical application, Chinese adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
