Do patients change in the ways we intend? Assessing acquisition of coping skills among cocaine-dependent patients.
Abstract
Few studies have evaluated whether substance users show changes associated with the hypothesized mechanisms of action of the treatments they receive. The Cocaine Risk Response Test (CRRT) is a role-play assessment of coping skills for high-risk situations associated with cocaine and other substance use. Initial psychometric analyses, using data from a series of randomized controlled trials, indicated very good interrater reliability and internal consistency, as well as significant increases from pre- to posttreatment in number, quality, and specificity of coping skills. Participants who had received different types of treatment were more likely to respond with coping skills characteristic of their assigned treatment, suggesting the measure may tap hypothesized mechanisms of treatment change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Break down of coping skills in high-risk situations is associated with cocaine and other substance abuse.
“For example, break down of coping skills in high-risk situations is associated with cocaine and other substance abuse.”
From Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research (2007) · cites this paper as Carroll et al. 1999
A role-play measure (Cocaine Risk Response Test) has been developed, evaluated, and integrated into controlled treatment research to evaluate the mediator.
“A role-play measure (Cocaine Risk Response Test) has been developed, evaluated, and integrated into controlled treatment research to evaluate the mediator (Carroll et al. 1999, 2005).”
From Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research (2007) · cites this paper as Carroll et al. 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Carroll, K. M., Nich, C., Frankforter, T. L., & Bisighini, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-85
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2089568192
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- cocaine dependence, coping strategies, role-play assessment, therapeutic mechanisms, treatment response, addiction treatment, high-risk situations, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
