Cited by 131Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The joint WAIS-III and WMS-III factor structure: Development and cross-validation of a six-factor model of cognitive functioning.

Tulsky, David S., Price, Larry R.·2003·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

During the standardization of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.; WAIS-III) and the Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.; WMS-III) the participants in the normative study completed both scales. This "co-norming" methodology set the stage for full integration of the 2 tests and the development of an expanded structure of cognitive functioning. Until now, however, the WAIS-III and WMS-III had not been examined together in a factor analytic study. This article presents a series of confirmatory factor analyses to determine the joint WAIS-III and WMS-III factor structure. Using a structural equation modeling approach, a 6-factor model that included verbal, perceptual, processing speed, working memory, auditory memory, and visual memory constructs provided the best model fit to the data. Allowing select subtests to load simultaneously on 2 factors improved model fit and indicated that some subtests are multifaceted. The results were then replicated in a large cross-validation sample (N = 858).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive tests are comprised of related constructs and many subtests will have moderate to high correlations with each other.

    “Cognitive tests are comprised of related constructs (Holdnack & Weiss, 2006; Tulsky & Price, 2003) and many of the subtests will have moderate to high correlations with each other.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 59 · Cited by 131

Authors
Tulsky, D. S., & Price, L. R.
Affiliations
  • Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation (US)
  • Texas State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2003
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2009874164
Cited by
131
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
WAIS-III, WMS-III, factor structure, cognitive function, six-factor model, processing speed, working memory, auditory memory, visual memory, perceptual skills, verbal ability, cross-validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Wechsler Scales, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review