Cited by 209Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and carePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory--18 in adult survivors of childhood cancer: Results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Recklitis, Christopher J., Parsons, Susan K., Shih, Mei-Chiung, Mertens, Ann, Robison, Leslie L., Zeltzer, Lonnie·2006·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory--18 (BSI-18; L. R. Derogatis, 2000) was investigated in a sample of adult survivors of childhood cancer enrolled in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS; N = 8,945). An exploratory factor analysis with a randomly chosen subsample supported a 3-factor structure closely corresponding to the 3 BSI-18 subscales: Depression, Anxiety, and Somatization. Confirmatory factor analysis with structural equation modeling validated this 3-dimensional structure in a separate subsample, though an alternative 4-factor model also fit the data. Analysis of the 3-factor model showed consistent fit in male and female participants. Compared with available community-based norms, survivors reported fewer symptoms of psychological distress. Together, results support the hypothesized 3-dimensional structure of the BSI-18 and indicate the measure may be useful in assessing psychological distress in this growing population of cancer survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.22

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 75 · Cited by 209

Authors
Recklitis, C. J., Parsons, S. K., Shih, M.-C., Mertens, A., Robison, L. L., & Zeltzer, L.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2006-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
22-32
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W1999629997
Cited by
209
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Health and Human Services (U24-CA-55727)
  • Children's Cancer Research
  • Friend's of Dana-Farber
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Brief Symptom Inventory-18, factor structure, childhood cancer survivors, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, somatization, Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, psychometric validation, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Somatoform Disorders, Cohort Studies, Survivors, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review