The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SWLS has demonstrated moderate temporal stability (Pavot & Diener, 1993”
From Online community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) for rural concerned significant others: A randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as Pavot & Diener, 1993
In the citing paper
“The SWLS has shown good internal consistency ( α = .87) and good temporal stability ( r = .82) over 2 weeks (Diener et al. 1985), and good convergent validity and discriminant validity across a range of different populations (Pavot and Diener 1993).”
From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Pavot and Diener 1993
In the citing paper
“The scale has good internal consistency (α = 0.88 in a Swedish trial [45]) and validity and has been shown to be sensitive to change [46, 47].”
From Acceptance as a Mediator for Change in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Persons with Chronic Pain? (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“The SWLS has been found to have good validity and reliability and has been shown to correlate with measures of mental health [37,38].”
From Mobile Mental Wellness Training for Stress Management: Feasibility and Design Implications Based on a One-Month Field Study (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
Diener, E. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34 · Cited by 7,121
Self-citationNew well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y · Cited by 4,980
Self-citationThe meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80 · Cited by 4,843
Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA
Oswald, A. J., & Blanchflower, D. G. (1999) · Cited by 2,774
Metadata
- Authors
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E.
- ORCID
- Diener, Ed
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-172
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W4211035711
- Cited by
- 3,611
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 189 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 207 · 2016: 190 · 2015: 180 · 2014: 164 · 2013: 185 · 2012: 159
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- Satisfaction with Life Scale, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, psychometric properties, scale validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
