Cited by 133Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsConsumer behavior in food and healthConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness and consumerism.

Rosenberg, Erika L.·2004·Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10658-007

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rosenberg, E. L.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenberg, Erika L.
Venue
Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world.
Published
2004
Pages
107-125
OpenAlex
W2491839986
Cited by
133
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
FWCI
2.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
mindfulness, consumerism, consumer behavior, materialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review