Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.
Abstract
Practices of data analysis in psychology and related disciplines are changing. This is evident in the longstanding controversy about statistical tests in the behavioral sciences and the increasing number of journals requiring effect size information. This book offers integrative and clear presentations about the limitations of statistical tests and reviews alternative methods of data analysis, such as effect size estimation (at both the group and case levels) and interval estimation (i.e., confidence intervals). Written in a clear and accessible style, it is intended for applied researchers and students who may not have strong quantitative backgrounds. Readers will learn how to measure effect size on continuous or dichotomous outcomes in comparative studies with independent or dependent samples. They will also learn how to calculate and correctly interpret confidence intervals for effect sizes. Numerous research examples from a wide range of areas illustrate the application of these principles and how to estimate substantive significance instead of just statistical significance. Additional alternatives to statistical tests are also described, including meta-analysis, resampling techniques like bootstrapping, and Bayesian estimation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Key developmental adaptations may enhance the effectiveness of SPIs for adolescents.
“Key developmental adaptions may enhance the effectiveness of SPIs for adolescents.51”
From Safety Planning Interventions for Suicide Prevention in Children and Adolescents (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1,034
- Authors
- Kline, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kline, Rex B.
- ORCID
- Kline, Rex B.
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W1550659230
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- effect size estimation, confidence intervals, substantive significance, statistical power, meta-analysis, bootstrapping, Bayesian estimation, behavioral research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review