Cited by 219Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentAging and Gerontology ResearchFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well-being

Moen, Phyllis·1996·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.131

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Moen, P.
Corresponding author
Moen, Phyllis
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
1996
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
131-144
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
OpenAlex
W4322702778
Cited by
217
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
retirement, gender differences, well-being, life course, older adults, work-life transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review