The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Permutation test is not distribution-free: Testing H₀: ρ = 0.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hayes (1996) shows the advantage of permutation tests over the classical approaches for the analysis of small samples and nonnormal data.”
From Analyzing social experiments as implemented: A reexamination of the evidence from the HighScope Perry Preschool Program (2010) · cites this paper as Hayes (1996)
In the citing paper
“Because permutation tests give accurate p-values even when the sampling distribution is skewed, they are often used when sample sizes are small and sample statistics are unlikely to be normal.”
From Analyzing social experiments as implemented: A reexamination of the evidence from the HighScope Perry Preschool Program (2010) · cites this paper as Hayes (1996)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Bishara, A. J., & Hittner, J. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028087 · Cited by 766
(2010) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe8 · Cited by 304
“Heckman (2005) discusses the problems of the small sample size, the need to use small sample inference to analyze the Perry data, and the appropriate way to combine inference across hypotheses.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, A. F.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hayes, Andrew F.
- ORCID
- Hayes, Andrew F.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-198
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W1688204489
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- permutation tests, correlation coefficient, null hypothesis testing, rank tests, asymptotic distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
