The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.
Abstract
Cognitive diagnosis models are constrained (multiple classification) latent class models that characterize the relationship of questionnaire responses to a set of dichotomous latent variables. Having emanated from educational measurement, several aspects of such models seem well suited to use in psychological assessment and diagnosis. This article presents the development of a new cognitive diagnosis model for use in psychological assessment--the DINO (deterministic input; noisy "or" gate) model--which, as an illustrative example, is applied to evaluate and diagnose pathological gamblers. As part of this example, a demonstration of the estimates obtained by cognitive diagnosis models is provided. Such estimates include the probability an individual meets each of a set of dichotomous Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (text revision [DSM-IV-TR]; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) criteria, resulting in an estimate of the probability an individual meets the DSM-IV-TR definition for being a pathological gambler. Furthermore, a demonstration of how the hypothesized underlying factors contributing to pathological gambling can be measured with the DINO model is presented, through use of a covariance structure model for the tetrachoric correlation matrix of the dichotomous latent variables representing DSM-IV-TR criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734
A New, Empirically Established Hypochondriasis Diagnosis
Fink, P., Ørnbøl, E., Toft, T., Sparle, K. C., Frostholm, L., & Olesen, F. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1680 · Cited by 215
SOLOMON, A., HAAGA, D. A. F., & ARNOW, B. A. (2001) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-200108000-00002 · Cited by 188
Cited by
The Generalized DINA Model Framework
de la Torre, J. (2011) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7 · Cited by 772
Defining a Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Using Log-Linear Models with Latent Variables
Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2009) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9089-5 · Cited by 559
Self-citationAI-assisted knowledge assessment techniques for adaptive learning environments
Minn, S. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100050 · Cited by 166
Roesch, S. C., Villodas, M., & Villodas, F. (2010) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.003 · Cited by 148
Item Response Theory: A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurement
Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2025) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/23-sts896 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-305
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W1988709327
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1082-989x.11.3.287
- The paper
- Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.11.3.287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.