The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: A latent variable multilevel model.
Abstract
In multilevel modeling, one often distinguishes between macro-micro and micro-macro situations. In a macro-micro multilevel situation, a dependent variable measured at the lower level is predicted or explained by variables measured at that lower or a higher level. In a micro-macro multilevel situation, a dependent variable defined at the higher group level is predicted or explained on the basis of independent variables measured at the lower individual level. Up until now, multilevel methodology has mainly focused on macro-micro multilevel situations. In this article, a latent variable model is proposed for analyzing data from micro-macro situations. It is shown that regression analyses carried out at the aggregated level result in biased parameter estimates. A method that uses the best linear unbiased predictors of the group means is shown to yield unbiased estimates of the parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 · Cited by 4,623
Cited by
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0020141 · Cited by 3,796
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610387438 · Cited by 162
Wu, J.-Y., & Kwok, O.-M. (2012) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634703 · Cited by 148
Going Beyond Convergence in Bayesian Estimation: Why Precision Matters Too and How to Assess It
Zitzmann, S., & Hecht, M. (2019) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1545232 · Cited by 122
Measuring Effective Teacher-Student Interactions From a Student Perspective: A Multi-Level Analysis
Downer, J. T., Stuhlman, M., Schweig, J., Martínez, J. F., & Ruzek, E. (2015) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431614564059 · Cited by 111
What does physiological synchrony reveal about metacognitive experiences and group performance?
Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Haataja, E. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12981 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Croon, M. A., & van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-57
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2007553837
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.