The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the logic and purpose of significance testing.
Abstract
There has been much recent attention given to the problems involved with the traditional approach to null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). Many have suggested that, perhaps, NHST should be abandoned altogether in favor of other bases for conclusions such as confidence intervals and effect size estimates (e.g., Schmidt, 1996). The purposes of this article are to (a) review the function that data analysis is supposed to serve in the social sciences, (b) examine the ways in which these functions are performed by NHST, (c) examine the case against NHST, and (d) evaluate interval-based estimation as an alternative to NHST.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in many cases, researchers aim to decide whether significant results are consistent or inconsistent with directional (dividing) hypotheses”
From Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings? (2020) · cites this paper as Cortina & Dunlap, 1997, p. 168
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–135 of 135
O’Keefe, D. J. (2011) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.568375 · Cited by 4
“…the obtained sample result: “Rejection of a given null hypothesis implies the rejection not only of the particular null value in question, but also of all of the values in the end of the distribution that is opposite to the end in which the observed value resides” (Cortina & Dunlap, 1997, p. 168).”
BackgroundOn Scientific Research: The Role of Statistical Modeling and Hypothesis Testing
Harlow, L. (2010) · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1288584180 · Cited by 6
“Devlin (1998) agreed, pointing out how probability theory is useful when it is necessary to make crucial decisions about whether to endorse a particular treatment or intervention.”
BackgroundGraphical Inference in Geographical Research
Widen, H. M., Elsner, J. B., Pau, S., & Uejio, C. K. (2015) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/gean.12085 · Cited by 4
“A straw man is an argument set up so that it is easily refuted (Cortina and Dunlap 1997).”
BackgroundCommentary: The Need for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in Psychological Science
Perezgonzalez, J. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01434 · Cited by 5
“…not H0 (3) Correction (3) now highlights another of the problems: The second premise simply affirms that an unlikely result just happened (also Cortina and Dunlap, 1997), something which is neither precluded by the first premise (no contrapositive ensues; Adams, 1988) nor formally conducive…”
BackgroundNull hypothesis significance testing in simulation
Hofmann, M. A. (2016) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2016.7822118 · Cited by 4
“Important fundamental defenses can be found in (Dooling and Danks 1975; Mulaik, Raju, and Harshman 1997; Cortina and Dunlap 1997; Hagen 1997; Senn 2001) and, implicit, in (Miller 2009).”
BackgroundLambert, L. (2007) · doi:10.1177/1094428107307913 · Cited by 4
“…not draw attention to the fact that constructing confidence intervals relies on the same estimated parameters, standard errors, and alpha levels that generate tests of significance and are therefore subject to the same interpretations and limitations as a significance test (Cortina & Dunlap, 1997).”
BackgroundBarry, A., Valdez, D., Goodson, P., Szucs, L. E., & Reyes, J. V. (2018) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1470091 · Cited by 3
Dutta, S., & Pullig, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.010 · Cited by 3
Quantitative Methods in Geography Education Research: Concept and Application of Effect Size
김, 민. (2011) · The Journal of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education · doi:10.17279/jkagee.2011.19.2.205 · Cited by 3
Hibbing, P. R., Welk, G. J., & Dixon, P. M. (2024) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.017 · Cited by 2
That's not a two‐sided test! It's two one‐sided tests!
Rubin, M. (2020) · Significance · doi:10.1111/1740-9713.01405 · Cited by 2
Commentary: Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null
Perezgonzalez, J., Frías-Navarro, D., & Pascual-Llobell, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01715 · Cited by 2
“In such context, H0 provides a precise statistical hypothesis for carrying out the test and, because the actual parameter (1) is unknown, it only provides informative value via its rejection (Fisher, 1954), H0 acting merely as a “straw man” (Cortina and Dunlap, 1997).”
BackgroundLansberry, K., Taylor, T., & Seale, E. (2017) · Journal of Poverty · doi:10.1080/10875549.2016.1141380 · Cited by 2
“Readers should note we are examining a population, not a sample, and statistical significance is less applicable when generalizing to a larger population (Cortina & Dunlap, 1997).”
MethodMultiple statistical tests: Lessons from a d20
Madan, C. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8834.2 · Cited by 2
Tarescavage, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. (2015) · Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1040843 · Cited by 2
“To demonstrate that the method cannot directly estimate MMPI-2-RF cumulative elevation rates in a psychologically healthy population, we refer the reader to the computer program created by Crawford et al. (2007) to estimate cumulative rates of abnormal scores in a normative sample.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKu, M.-J., Dossin, F. D. M., Hansen, M. A. E., Genovesio, A., Ayong, L. S., & Freitas-Junior, L. H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041765 · Cited by 1
“2A, the CSA-panned erythrocytes exhibited over 4-fold increase in binding to the placental cells when compared to the CD36-panned cells (p-value of 0.004 [22]).”
ResultInfluentialNull Hypothesis Significance Testing: Ramifications, Ruminations and Recommendations
Huysamen, G. (2005) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630503500101 · Cited by 2
“However, Cortina and Dunlap ( 1997) pointed out that the application of the modus tollens in Cohen's example is not representative of its use in psychology, in that the consequent ('that person is probably not a member of Congress') is true, irrespective of whether or not the antecedent is true.”
BackgroundResearch Methods Pedagogy: Engaging Psychology Students in Research Methods and Statistics
Roberts, L. (2016) · doi:10.3389/978-2-88945-010-7 · Cited by 2
The pursuit of positive affect in task advice networks: Effects on individual performance
Casciaro, T. (2013) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.212 · Cited by 3
“Caution should be used, however, in interpreting the lack of evidence for positive effect of competence- and sharing-based advice seeking (Cortina & Dunlap, 1997; Cortina & Folger, 1998).”
BackgroundNull-Hypothesis Significance Testing: Misconceptons
Nickerson, R. S. (2011) · International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_422 · Cited by 2
Kline, R., Parsons, T., & Nelson, N. W. (2004) · doi:10.1037/040278 · Cited by 2
Rubin, M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21792 · Cited by 1
“From this perspective, Type I error rates are contingent on hypothetical sampling distributions based on formally specified hypotheses, rather than “actual” sampling distributions based on “actual” test procedure s (e.g., Cortina & Dunlap, 1997, pp. 166 – 167; see also Fisher, 1956, p. 44).”
InfluentialThou Shalt Not Reject the P-valuePreprint
Chén, O. Y., Saraiva, R. G., Nagels, G., Phan, H. P., Schwantje, T., Cao, H.-Y., Gou, J., Reinen, J. M., Xiong, B., & Vos, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.18014.59206/1 · Cited by 1
“The null hypothesis significance test is a hybrid of the two; it follows the NP-test procedurally and Fisher philosophically (Cortina and Dunlap 1997; Hubbard 2004; Johnstone et al. 1986; Perezgonzalez 2015; Spielman 1978).”
MethodStatistical Significance and Replicability
Sohn, D. (1998) · doi:10.1177/0959354398083004 · Cited by 1
On the Whys and Hows of Quantitative Research
Cortina, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8
Self-citationTime to dispense with the p-value in OR?
Hofmann, M. A., & Meyer-Nieberg, S. (2017) · Central European Journal of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10100-017-0484-9 · Cited by 14
Kiers, H., Smilde, A., & Bouwmeester, H. (2026) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.70180
Gilleland, E., Muñoz‐Esparza, D., & Turner, D. D. (2023) · Weather and forecasting · doi:10.1175/waf-d-22-0201.1
“If it were only of interest to know whether or not one forecast model is better more often than the other, without regard for which one, then a twosided test would be performed, which would require adjusting the size of the test in each direction from a to a/2 (Cortina and Dunlap 1997; Cox et al. 1977; Meehl 1967; Tuk…”
BackgroundMasharipov, R., Nikolaev, Y., Korotkov, A., Didur, M., Cherednichenko, D., & Kireev, M. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.06.02.446711
“…the abovementioned pitfalls in data interpretation, they are still subject to some of the same types of problems as the p-values and classic NHST (Cortina and Dunlap, 1997; Nickerson, 2000; Belia et al., 2005; Wagenmakers et al., 2008; Kruschke, 2013; Kruschke and Liddell, 2017a; Hoekstra et…”
BackgroundSkidmore, S. T. (2009) · Middle grades research journal · doi:10.1108/mgrj-09-2009-0005
Smyth, D. (2008) · Cancer Nursing Practice · doi:10.7748/cnp.7.6.22.s11
Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_15
The Roles of Statistical Significance Testing In Research
Aliyu, R. (2013) · doi:10.9790/7388-0157883
“org 83 | Page [7].”
Hobart, J. (1999) · doi:10.17037/pubs.00682304
“Results are reported in terms of the magnitude and statistical significance of change scores as clinical and statistical significance are not necessarily equivalent (288,289).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2153986420
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- null hypothesis significance testing, confidence intervals, effect size estimation, social science research, statistical inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review