Attachment in Coping with Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration
Abstract
Researchers have deplored shortcomings in theoretically based models of coping with bereavement. Integration of cognitive stress with attachment theory is proposed to predict adjustment to bereavement, describe different forms of effective coping, and resolve ongoing debates about continuing versus relinquishing bonds. These 2 generic approaches are integrated within a bereavement-specific perspective, the dual-process model of coping ( Stroebe & Schut, 1999 ). Accordingly, (a) different coping styles are adopted by, and are differentially efficacious for, bereaved people according to their style of attachment; (b) bereaved people's ways of continuing bonds differ according to their attachment style; and (c) grief complications are associated with insecure attachment styles. The authors conclude that it is better for some bereaved individuals to work toward retaining ties and for others to work toward loosening ties.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 96 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Stroebe, Margaret
- Venue
- Review of General Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-66
- ISSN
- 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1552
- OpenAlex
- W1991811880
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- bereavement, grief, attachment theory, coping styles, attachment styles, continuing bonds, adaptation to loss, cognitive stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review