Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology
Abstract
Colonial mentality is a term used widely by ethnic studies scholars and by the Filipino American community to refer to a form of internalized oppression among Filipinos and Filipino Americans. The authors propose that colonial mentality is a construct that is central to the understanding of the psychology of contemporary Filipino Americans. Drawing on larger scholarship from postcolonial studies and psychological research on oppression, the authors review the historical and sociological contexts in which to understand the significance of the colonial mentality concept for the Filipino American population. The authors also review the existing literature on colonial mentality and provide specific recommendations for incorporating this construct into research and practice with Filipino Americans. It is argued, through this illustrative example of colonial mentality among Filipino Americans, that examining the psychological impact of colonialism is a way to incorporate larger historical and sociological contextual variables into ethnic minority research and practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In quantitative work, recruitment of participants based on their identities requires the research team to disclose relevant details about their own personal and scholarly positionality to avoid the appearance of bias(es).
“Although this work is quantitative in nature, the recruitment of participants based on their identities requires the research team to disclose relevant details about their own personal and scholarly positionality to avoid the appearance of bias(es) [69].”
From Internalized Racism and Mental Health: The Moderating Role of Collective Racial Self-Esteem (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 252
- Authors
- David, E. J. R., & Okazaki, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0106
- 1099-9809
- OpenAlex
- W2058383843
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
- Keywords
- colonial mentality, Filipino Americans, internalized oppression, colonialism, postcolonial studies, ethnic minority psychology
- MeSH terms
- Asian, Attitude, Culture, Humans, Mental Health, Philippines, United States, Colonialism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review