Cited by 252Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCounseling Practices and SupervisionAsian American and Pacific Histories

Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology

David, E. J. R., Okazaki, Sumie·2006·Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Abstract

Colonial mentality is a term used widely by ethnic studies scholars and by the Filipino American community to refer to a form of internalized oppression among Filipinos and Filipino Americans. The authors propose that colonial mentality is a construct that is central to the understanding of the psychology of contemporary Filipino Americans. Drawing on larger scholarship from postcolonial studies and psychological research on oppression, the authors review the historical and sociological contexts in which to understand the significance of the colonial mentality concept for the Filipino American population. The authors also review the existing literature on colonial mentality and provide specific recommendations for incorporating this construct into research and practice with Filipino Americans. It is argued, through this illustrative example of colonial mentality among Filipino Americans, that examining the psychological impact of colonialism is a way to incorporate larger historical and sociological contextual variables into ethnic minority research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1099-9809.12.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In quantitative work, recruitment of participants based on their identities requires the research team to disclose relevant details about their own personal and scholarly positionality to avoid the appearance of bias(es).

    “Although this work is quantitative in nature, the recruitment of participants based on their identities requires the research team to disclose relevant details about their own personal and scholarly positionality to avoid the appearance of bias(es) [69].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 252

Authors
David, E. J. R., & Okazaki, S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
Published
2006-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1077-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0106
  • 1099-9809
OpenAlex
W2058383843
Cited by
252
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
Keywords
colonial mentality, Filipino Americans, internalized oppression, colonialism, postcolonial studies, ethnic minority psychology
MeSH terms
Asian, Attitude, Culture, Humans, Mental Health, Philippines, United States, Colonialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review