The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluid vulnerability theory: a cognitive approach to understanding the process of acute and chronic suicide risk
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, dysfunctional self-regulatory processes invite maladaptive responses to acute stressors (e.g., substance use) that can interact with various dynamic factors (e.g., low mood, social isolation) to induce an imminent suicide crisis (Bryan et al., 2020; Rudd, 2006).”
From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as Rudd, 2006
In the citing paper
“Current psychological interventions for suicidal individuals, which are informed by existing theoretical models, have limitations.”
From The Psychological Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Strategy of Control Without Awareness (2021) · cites this paper as Rudd, 2006
In the citing paper
“It may be, therefore, that these fluctuations in suicide risk and rapid transitions from contemplating suicide to making an attempt are due to psychological processes, which might be different for ideators and attempters (Rudd, 2006; Bryan et al., 2016, 2019).”
From The Psychological Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Strategy of Control Without Awareness (2021) · cites this paper as Rudd, 2006
In the citing paper
“However, it goes beyond recent theoretical accounts of ambivalence about suicide (Linehan et al., 1983; Jobes, 2006; Rudd, 2006), since we posit that one’s combined reasons for living and reasons for dying are simultaneously associated with distress, due to the loss of control they may entail.”
From The Psychological Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Strategy of Control Without Awareness (2021) · cites this paper as Rudd, 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of suicidal behaviour
O'Connor, R. C., & Nock, M. K. (2014) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70222-6 · Cited by 1,193
Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis
Dworkin, E. R., Menon, S. V., Bystrynski, J., & Allen, N. E. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002 · Cited by 825
Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update
Klonsky, E. D., Saffer, B. Y., & Bryan, C. J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020 · Cited by 673
The role of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety, and suicide.
Taylor, P. J., Gooding, P. A., Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0022935 · Cited by 446
“These may include preexisting mental models for suicidal behavior, beliefs about suicide, or suicidogenic schema (Johnson et al., 2008; Lau, Segal, & Williams, 2004; Pratt, Gooding, Johnson, Taylor, & Tarrier, 2010; Rudd, 2006; Williams et al., 2005).”
BackgroundReal-time assessment of suicidal thoughts and behaviors
Kleiman, E. M., & Nock, M. K. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.026 · Cited by 239
“A tenant of the Fluid Vulnerability Theory is that suicidal ideation fluctuates close to a baseline with episodic peaks representing suicidal crises [13,14].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudd, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rudd, M. David
- ORCID
- Rudd, M. David
- Venue
- Cognition and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 355-368
- OpenAlex
- W1744999525
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 20.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- suicide risk, cognitive approach, suicide prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
