Psychological and physical aggression in couples: Causes and interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional IPV is the most reported subtype of intimate partner violence across adolescent and adult populations.
“Among all subtypes of intimate partner violence, emotional IPV is the most reported across adolescent and adult populations (FitzPatrick et al., 2022;O'Leary & Woodin, 2009;Toplu-Demirtaş & Hatipoğlu-Sümer, 2023).”
From The Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as O'Leary & Woodin, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 72
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W2488802544
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- psychological aggression, physical aggression, intimate partner violence, couples, causes of aggression, intervention, domestic violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
