The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recollections of historical injustice: A qualitative investigation of emotions in Japanese American incarceration memories.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotions of 'angry/bitter' were mentioned by more than 40% of Nisei project interviewees when discussing their postincarceration perspectives.
“emotions of 'angry/bitter' were mentioned by more than 40% of Nisei project interviewees when discussing their postincarceration perspectives (Nagata et al., 2012)”
From Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration (2015) · cites this paper as Nagata et al., 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Processing Cultural Trauma: Intergenerational Effects of the Japanese American Incarceration
Nagata, D. K., Kim, J. H. J., & Nguyen, T. U. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12115 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagata, D. K., Cheng, W. J. Y., & Nguyen, T. U.
- ORCID
- Nagata, Donna K.
- Venue
- Qualitative strategies for ethnocultural research.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 103-118
- OpenAlex
- W2505348278
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Keywords
- Japanese American incarceration, internment, historical injustice, emotions, memory, recollection, Japanese Americans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
