Internet sex offenders.
Abstract
Also reflecting the nonlinearity and linkages of the Internet, this book includes footnotes and appendices that do not follow the main narrative but provide additional information and context about the content in the corresponding chapter. One can treat them like links or pop-up boxes while reading"--Preface. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In contrast to blunt (online) sexual solicitations, sexual (online) grooming is hardly observable based on a single determining behavior.
“In contrast to blunt (online) sexual solicitations, sexual (online) grooming is hardly observable based on a single determining behavior (Seto, 2013).”
From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Seto, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 388 · Cited by 191
- Authors
- Seto, M. C.
- Corresponding author
- Seto, Michael C.
- ORCID
- Seto, Michael C.
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W2488715620
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 388
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- online sexual offending, cybersex, child sexual exploitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
