Cited by 202Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grief across cultures: A review and research agenda.

Rosenblatt, Paul C.·2008·Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/14498-010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–201 of 201

Metadata

Authors
Rosenblatt, P. C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenblatt, Paul C.
Venue
Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention.
Published
2008
Pages
207-222
OpenAlex
W2484641547
Cited by
202
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
19.99
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
grief, bereavement, cross-cultural comparison, cultural psychology, mourning, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review