Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention.
Abstract
Although both attention and motivation affect behavior, how these 2 systems interact is currently unknown. To address this question, 2 experiments were conducted in which participants performed a spatially cued forced-choice localization task under varying levels of motivation. Participants were asked to indicate the location of a peripherally cued target while ignoring a distracter. Motivation was manipulated by varying magnitude and valence (reward and punishment) of an incentive linked to task performance. Attention was manipulated via a peripheral cue, which correctly predicted the presence of a target stimulus on 70% of the trials. Taken together, our findings revealed that the signal detection measure, reflecting perceptual sensitivity, increased as a function of incentive value during both valid and invalid trials. In addition, trend analyses revealed a linear increase in detection sensitivity as a function of incentive magnitude for both reward and punishment conditions. Our results suggest that elevated motivation leads to improved efficiency in orienting and reorienting of exogenous spatial attention and that one mechanism by which attention and motivation interact involves the sharpening of attention during motivationally salient conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Engelmann and Pessoa (2007) showed in a spatial cueing task that participants had higher detection sensitivity in rewarded blocks than in non-rewarded blocks.
“For instance, Engelmann and Pessoa (2007) showed in a spatial cueing task (Posner, Snyder, & Davidson, 1980), that participants had a higher detection sensitivity in blocks in which they were informed that good performance was rewarded compared to blocks in which they knew it was not”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Engelmann & Pessoa, 2007
Incentives improve performance via motivating strategic processes such as preparation of an appropriate attentional or oculomotor orienting response or facilitating selective attenuation of irrelevant distractors.
“Studies like these suggest that incentives improve performance via motivating strategic processes such as the preparation of an appropriate attentional or oculomotor orienting response (e.g., Bucker & Theeuwes, 2014; Engelmann & Pessoa, 2007; Milstein & Dorris, 2007; Sawaki, Luck, & Raymond, 2015; Small et al., 2005) or facilitating selective attenuation of irrelevant distractors (i.e., attent”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Engelmann & Pessoa, 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- Engelmann, J. B., & Pessoa, L.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 668-674
- ISSN
- 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1516
- OpenAlex
- W1963830640
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2007-11-26)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Association for Psychological Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- motivation, incentive value, reward, punishment, peripheral cueing, signal detection, perceptual sensitivity, attentional reorienting, attentional orienting
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Reward, Sensitivity and Specificity, Space Perception, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review