Cited by 30Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men.

Moore, Todd M., Stuart, Gregory L., McNulty, James K., Addis, Michael E., Cordova, James V., Temple, Jeff R.·2010·Psychology of Violence

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between the specific factors of the Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scale and intimate partner violence among a clinical sample of violent men. Participants were 339 men court-mandated to attend violence intervention programs. After demonstrating that the 5-factor MGRS model evidenced strong fit in this sample, analyses revealed that MGRS total scores were associated with each form of intimate partner violence perpetration. However, subsequent analyses that regressed each form of aggression onto all 5 MGRS factors simultaneously revealed that different factors were responsible for each association. Specifically, gender role stress regarding failure to perform in work and sexual domains was the only factor associated with psychological aggression, gender role stress regarding appearing physically fit and not appearing feminine was the only factor associated with sexual coercion, and gender role stress regarding intellectual inferiority was the only factor associated with injury to partners. No single MGRS factor was uniquely associated with physical aggression. Implications are discussed in terms of the importance of examining specific domains of gender role stress when studying and treating partner violence. © 2010 American Psychological Association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/2152-0828.1.s.68

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Moore, T. M., Stuart, G. L., McNulty, J. K., Addis, M. E., Cordova, J. V., & Temple, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Clark University (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Moore, Todd M.
Venue
Psychology of Violence
Published
2010-08
Volume
1
Issue
S
Pages
68-75
ISSN
  • 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0828
OpenAlex
W2150720030
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K12HD052023)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculine gender role stress, intimate partner violence, men who perpetrate violence, psychological aggression, sexual coercion, physical aggression, physical fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review