Actual change and inaccurate recall contribute to posttraumatic growth following radiotherapy.
Abstract
People with cancer often report that they experience personal growth as a result of the disease, but such reports have unclear validity. Some suggest such growth results from Rogers's (1951) hypothesized organismic valuing process (OVP), an innate tendency for people to gravitate toward well-being; others suggest this growth may be a positive illusion resulting from temporal self-comparisons. To test these conceptualizations, the authors examined 83 individuals with Stages 0-III breast or prostate cancer. Patients completed measures of positive attributes and personal life goals before radiotherapy (Time 1) and after radiotherapy (Time 2). At Time 2, participants also attempted to recreate their Time 1 responses and completed a posttraumatic growth (PTG) measure. PTG was significantly related with actual increases (but not perceived increases) in the relative importance of intrinsic goals versus extrinsic goals and with perceived increases (but not actual increases) in positive attributes. These measures were unrelated to one another and thus explained unique variance in PTG. Data suggest that both actual change processes related to the OVP and biases in autobiographic recall may independently contribute to PTG reports.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceptions of growth can result from patients' denigration of their own pre-cancer attributes rather than true change.
“some studies have found that perceptions of growth result from patients’ denigration of their own pre-cancer attributes rather than true change.36”
From Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta‐analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Ransom, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Jacobsen, P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 811-819
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2117982264
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- posttraumatic growth, radiotherapy, breast cancer, prostate cancer, positive illusions, personal growth, cancer survivors
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspirations, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Goals, Humans, Illusions, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Neoplasm Staging, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Illness Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review