Cited by 77Cancer survivorship and careIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Actual change and inaccurate recall contribute to posttraumatic growth following radiotherapy.

Ransom, Sean, Sheldon, Kennon M., Jacobsen, Paul B.·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

People with cancer often report that they experience personal growth as a result of the disease, but such reports have unclear validity. Some suggest such growth results from Rogers's (1951) hypothesized organismic valuing process (OVP), an innate tendency for people to gravitate toward well-being; others suggest this growth may be a positive illusion resulting from temporal self-comparisons. To test these conceptualizations, the authors examined 83 individuals with Stages 0-III breast or prostate cancer. Patients completed measures of positive attributes and personal life goals before radiotherapy (Time 1) and after radiotherapy (Time 2). At Time 2, participants also attempted to recreate their Time 1 responses and completed a posttraumatic growth (PTG) measure. PTG was significantly related with actual increases (but not perceived increases) in the relative importance of intrinsic goals versus extrinsic goals and with perceived increases (but not actual increases) in positive attributes. These measures were unrelated to one another and thus explained unique variance in PTG. Data suggest that both actual change processes related to the OVP and biases in autobiographic recall may independently contribute to PTG reports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 77

Authors
Ransom, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Jacobsen, P. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008-10
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
811-819
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2117982264
Cited by
77
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, radiotherapy, breast cancer, prostate cancer, positive illusions, personal growth, cancer survivors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspirations, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Goals, Humans, Illusions, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Neoplasm Staging, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Mental Recall, Repression, Psychology, Illness Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review