Cited by 306Face Recognition and PerceptionTactile and Sensory InteractionsEmotions and Moral Behavior

Spontaneous facial expressions of emotion of congenitally and noncongenitally blind individuals

Matsumoto, David, Willingham, Bob·2009·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The study of the spontaneous expressions of blind individuals offers a unique opportunity to understand basic processes concerning the emergence and source of facial expressions of emotion. In this study, the authors compared the expressions of congenitally and noncongenitally blind athletes in the 2004 Paralympic Games with each other and with those produced by sighted athletes in the 2004 Olympic Games. The authors also examined how expressions change from 1 context to another. There were no differences between congenitally blind, noncongenitally blind, and sighted athletes, either on the level of individual facial actions or in facial emotion configurations. Blind athletes did produce more overall facial activity, but these were isolated to head and eye movements. The blind athletes' expressions differentiated whether they had won or lost a medal match at 3 different points in time, and there were no cultural differences in expression. These findings provide compelling evidence that the production of spontaneous facial expressions of emotion is not dependent on observational learning but simultaneously demonstrates a learned component to the social management of expressions, even among blind individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0014037

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mannerisms used by congenitally blind individuals to express emotions like happiness and pride do not differ from those in sighted individuals.

    “Likewise, mannerisms used by congenitally blind individuals to express emotions like happiness and pride do not differ from those in sighted individuals, despite never visually witnessing these behaviors (Galati et al., 1997;Matsumoto and Willingham, 2009).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Matsumoto and Willingham, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, D., & Willingham, B.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2009-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2124633402
Cited by
306
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotional facial expressions, congenital blindness, acquired blindness, spontaneous expression, Paralympic athletes, Olympic athletes, facial action units, head and eye movements, observational learning
MeSH terms
Blindness, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Smiling, Social Behavior, Sports, Persons with Visual Disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review