Cited by 369Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

Working memory plasticity in old age: practice gain, transfer, and maintenance

Open access
Li, Shu-Chen, Schmiedek, Florian, Huxhold, Oliver, Röcke, Christina, Smith, Jacqui, Lindenberger, Ulman·2008·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Adult age differences in cognitive plasticity have been studied less often in working memory than in episodic memory. The authors investigated the effects of extensive working memory practice on performance improvement, transfer, and short-term maintenance of practice gains and transfer effects. Adults age 20-30 years and 70-80 years practiced a spatial working memory task with 2 levels of processing demands across 45 days for about 15 min per day. In both age groups and relative to age-matched, no-contact control groups, we found (a) substantial performance gains on the practiced task, (b) near transfer to a more demanding spatial n-back task and to numerical n-back tasks, and (c) 3-month maintenance of practice gains and near transfer effects, with decrements relative to postpractice performance among older but not younger adults. No evidence was found for far transfer to complex span tasks. The authors discuss neuronal mechanisms underlying adult age differences and similarities in patterns of plasticity and conclude that the potential of deliberate working memory practice as a tool for improving cognition in old age merits further exploration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0014343

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 369

Authors
Li, S.-C., Schmiedek, F., Huxhold, O., Röcke, C., Smith, J., & Lindenberger, U.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2008-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
731-742
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2120779247
Cited by
369
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 26
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
working memory, cognitive plasticity, aging, practice effects, transfer of learning, spatial working memory, n-back task, complex span, age differences, deliberate practice, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Practice, Psychological, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Serial Learning, Transfer, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review