Working memory plasticity in old age: practice gain, transfer, and maintenance
Open accessAbstract
Adult age differences in cognitive plasticity have been studied less often in working memory than in episodic memory. The authors investigated the effects of extensive working memory practice on performance improvement, transfer, and short-term maintenance of practice gains and transfer effects. Adults age 20-30 years and 70-80 years practiced a spatial working memory task with 2 levels of processing demands across 45 days for about 15 min per day. In both age groups and relative to age-matched, no-contact control groups, we found (a) substantial performance gains on the practiced task, (b) near transfer to a more demanding spatial n-back task and to numerical n-back tasks, and (c) 3-month maintenance of practice gains and near transfer effects, with decrements relative to postpractice performance among older but not younger adults. No evidence was found for far transfer to complex span tasks. The authors discuss neuronal mechanisms underlying adult age differences and similarities in patterns of plasticity and conclude that the potential of deliberate working memory practice as a tool for improving cognition in old age merits further exploration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some authors have attributed near transfer to the acquisition of a strategy.
“In fact, some authors have attributed near transfer to the acquisition of a strategy ([9, 29, 38]; see [21, 39] for a review)”
From Nearest transfer effects of working memory training: A comparison of two programs focused on working memory updating (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
The n-back task is probably the most widely used in WMU training programs.
“The n-back task is probably the most widely used in WMU training programs (e.g., [9–11]), and the arithmetical updating task has already been used in a previous training study and shown to produce specific training gains, at least [29].”
From Nearest transfer effects of working memory training: A comparison of two programs focused on working memory updating (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Our results using two updating paradigms are compatible with reports that performance improvements on one WM measure do not lead to gains on another type of WM task.
“Our results using two updating paradigms are therefore compatible with reports that performance improvements on one WM measure do not lead to gains on another type of WM task (e.g., [9, 11, 17]).”
From Nearest transfer effects of working memory training: A comparison of two programs focused on working memory updating (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Our results reflect those of other studies reporting no transfer effects to complex WM tasks.
“Our results reflect those of other studies reporting no transfer effects to complex WM tasks [8, 9, 11, 27].”
From Nearest transfer effects of working memory training: A comparison of two programs focused on working memory updating (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 369
- Authors
- Li, S.-C., Schmiedek, F., Huxhold, O., Röcke, C., Smith, J., & Lindenberger, U.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-742
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2120779247
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 21.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- working memory, cognitive plasticity, aging, practice effects, transfer of learning, spatial working memory, n-back task, complex span, age differences, deliberate practice, cognitive aging
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Practice, Psychological, Reaction Time, Retention, Psychology, Serial Learning, Transfer, Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review