Defining distinct negative beliefs about uncertainty: Validating the factor structure of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.
Abstract
This study examined the factor structure of the English version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS; French version: M. H. Freeston, J. Rhéaume, H. Letarte, M. J. Dugas, & R. Ladouceur, 1994; English version: K. Buhr & M. J. Dugas, 2002) using a substantially larger sample than has been used in previous studies. Nonclinical undergraduate students and adults from the community (M age = 23.74 years, SD = 6.36; 73.0% female and 27.0% male) who participated in 16 studies in the Anxiety Disorders Laboratory at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada were randomly assigned to 2 datasets. Exploratory factor analysis with the 1st sample (n = 1,230) identified 2 factors: the beliefs that "uncertainty has negative behavioral and self-referent implications" and that "uncertainty is unfair and spoils everything." This 2-factor structure provided a good fit to the data (Bentler-Bonett normed fit index = .96, comparative fit index = .97, standardized root-mean residual = .05, root-mean-square error of approximation = .07) upon confirmatory factor analysis with the 2nd sample (n = 1,221). Both factors showed similarly high correlations with pathological worry, and Factor 1 showed stronger correlations with generalized anxiety disorder analogue status, trait anxiety, somatic anxiety, and depressive symptomatology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The IUS has previously demonstrated good test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and excellent internal consistency in non-clinical samples.
“The IUS has previously demonstrated good test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and excellent internal consistency in non-clinical samples (Buhr and Dugas, 2002; Sexton and Dugas, 2009).”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Sexton and Dugas, 2009
Later confirmatory factor analyses have settled on two factors: prospective anxiety and inhibitory anxiety.
“Later, confirmatory factor analyses have also settled on two factors (Carleton, Norton, et al., 2007; Sexton & Dugas, 2009), namely, prospective anxiety and inhibitory anxiety.”
From Extension of the Transdiagnostic Model to Focus on Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment (2014) · cites this paper as Sexton & Dugas, 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 62 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Sexton, K. A., & Dugas, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-186
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2044025527
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- intolerance of uncertainty, Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, factor structure, pathological worry, generalized anxiety disorder, trait anxiety, somatic anxiety, depressive symptoms, anxiety disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review