A multisite randomized effectiveness trial of motivational enhancement therapy for Spanish-speaking substance users.
Open accessAbstract
Hispanic individuals are underrepresented in clinical and research populations and are often excluded from clinical trials in the United States. Hence, there are few data on the effectiveness of most empirically validated therapies for Hispanic substance users. The authors conducted a multisite randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of 3 individual sessions of motivational enhancement therapy with that of 3 individual sessions of counseling as usual on treatment retention and frequency of substance use; all assessment and treatment sessions were conducted in Spanish among 405 individuals seeking treatment for any type of current substance use. Treatment exposure was good, with 66% of participants completing all 3 protocol sessions. Although both interventions resulted in reductions in substance use during the 4-week therapy phase, there were no significant Treatment Condition x Time interactions nor Site x Treatment Condition interactions. Results suggest that the individual treatments delivered in Spanish were both attractive to and effective with this heterogeneous group of Hispanic adults, but the differential effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy may be limited to those whose primary substance use problem is alcohol and may be fairly modest in magnitude.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Carroll, K. M., Martino, S., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Frankforter, T., Anez, L. M., Paris, M., Suarez-Morales, L., Szapocznik, J., Miller, W. R., Rosa, C., Matthews, J., & Farentinos, C.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 993-999
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- PMC
- PMC2792592
- OpenAlex
- W2030358900
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10 DA13038)
- University of Miami (U10 DA13720)
- University of New Mexico (U10 DA015833)
- Columbia University (U10 DA13035)
- Oregon Health and Sciences University (U10 DA13036)
- Clinical Trials Network (Cooperative agreement U10 DA13716)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- motivational enhancement therapy, addiction treatment, treatment retention, alcohol consumption, underrepresentation in clinical trials, treatment effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Counseling, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Multilingualism, Substance-Related Disorders, Cultural Competency, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review