Cited by 328Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood Recognition

Cognitive appraisals and emotions predict cortisol and immune responses: A meta-analysis of acute laboratory social stressors and emotion inductions.

Denson, Thomas F., Spanovic, Marija, Miller, Norman·2009·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Models of stress and health suggest that emotions mediate the effects of stress on health; yet meta-analytic reviews have not confirmed these relationships. Categorizations of emotions along broad dimensions such as valence (e.g., positive and negative affect) may obscure important information about the effects of specific emotions on physiology. Within the context of the integrated specificity model, we present a novel theoretical framework that posits that specific emotional responses associated with specific types of environmental demands influence cortisol and immune outcomes in a manner that would have likely promoted the survival of our ancestors. We analyzed experiments from 66 journal articles that directly manipulated social stress or emotions and measured subsequent cortisol or immune responses. Judges rated experiments for the extent to which participants would experience theoretically relevant cognition and affect clustered around five categories: (a) cognitive appraisals, (b) basic emotions, (c) rumination and worry, (d) social threat, and (e) global mood states. As expected, global mood states were unassociated with the effect sizes, whereas exemplars from the other categories were generally associated with effect sizes in the expected manner. The present research suggests that coping strategies that alter appraisals and emotional responses may improve long-term health outcomes. This might be especially relevant for stressors that are acute or imminent, threaten…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016909

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 182 · Cited by 328

Authors
Denson, T. F., Spanovic, M., & Miller, N.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2009-11
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
823-853
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2024700550
Cited by
328
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
cognitive appraisal, emotions, cortisol, immune response, social stress, emotion induction, rumination, worry, social danger, coping strategies, stress and health, positive and negative affect
MeSH terms
Affect, Arousal, Attention, Cognition, Cytotoxicity Tests, Immunologic, Dominance-Subordination, Emotions, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Individuality, Killer Cells, Natural, Leukocyte Count, Psychoneuroimmunology, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review