Cognitive appraisals and emotions predict cortisol and immune responses: A meta-analysis of acute laboratory social stressors and emotion inductions.
Abstract
Models of stress and health suggest that emotions mediate the effects of stress on health; yet meta-analytic reviews have not confirmed these relationships. Categorizations of emotions along broad dimensions such as valence (e.g., positive and negative affect) may obscure important information about the effects of specific emotions on physiology. Within the context of the integrated specificity model, we present a novel theoretical framework that posits that specific emotional responses associated with specific types of environmental demands influence cortisol and immune outcomes in a manner that would have likely promoted the survival of our ancestors. We analyzed experiments from 66 journal articles that directly manipulated social stress or emotions and measured subsequent cortisol or immune responses. Judges rated experiments for the extent to which participants would experience theoretically relevant cognition and affect clustered around five categories: (a) cognitive appraisals, (b) basic emotions, (c) rumination and worry, (d) social threat, and (e) global mood states. As expected, global mood states were unassociated with the effect sizes, whereas exemplars from the other categories were generally associated with effect sizes in the expected manner. The present research suggests that coping strategies that alter appraisals and emotional responses may improve long-term health outcomes. This might be especially relevant for stressors that are acute or imminent, threaten…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stressors that evoke the strongest inflammatory responses in the laboratory are those that involve social conflict, rejection, or exclusion.
“stressors that evoke the strongest inflammatory responses in the laboratory are those that involve social conflict, rejection, or exclusion”
From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Denson et al., 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 182 · Cited by 328
- Authors
- Denson, T. F., Spanovic, M., & Miller, N.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Denson, Thomas F.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 823-853
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2024700550
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 182
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- cognitive appraisal, emotions, cortisol, immune response, social stress, emotion induction, rumination, worry, social danger, coping strategies, stress and health, positive and negative affect
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Arousal, Attention, Cognition, Cytotoxicity Tests, Immunologic, Dominance-Subordination, Emotions, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Individuality, Killer Cells, Natural, Leukocyte Count, Psychoneuroimmunology, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review