Comparison of immediate-onset and delayed-onset posttraumatic stress disorder in military veterans
Abstract
Differences in symptoms, trauma exposure, dissociative and emotional reactions to trauma, and subsequent life stress in war veterans reporting immediate-onset or delayed-onset posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or no PTSD were investigated. The role of life stress in delayed-onset PTSD was also studied. Retrospective interviews were conducted with 142 United Kingdom veterans receiving a war pension for PTSD or physical disability. Immediate-onset and delayed-onset PTSD were similar in the number and type of symptoms reported at onset, but the delayed-onset group differed in showing a gradual accumulation of symptoms that began earlier and continued throughout their military career. They were more likely to report major depressive disorder and alcohol abuse prior to PTSD onset. Both groups described similar amounts of trauma exposure, but those in the delayed-onset group reported significantly less peritraumatic dissociation, anger, and shame. Veterans with delayed onsets were more likely than veterans with no PTSD to report the presence of a severe life stressor in the year before onset. In conclusion, the results suggest that delayed onsets involve a more general stress sensitivity and a progressive failure to adapt to continued stress exposure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surrogates who are anxious and/or emotionally dependent on the patient are at heightened risk of PTSD, Prolonged Grief Disorder, and other adverse longer-term psychological outcomes.
“it targets surrogates who are anxious and/or emotionally dependent on the patient, thus placing them at heightened risk of PTSD, Prolonged Grief Disorder, and other adverse longer-term psychological outcomes (21, 22, 48, 61)”
From EMPOWER: A Multi-Site Pilot Trial to Reduce Distress in Surrogate Decision-Makers in the ICU (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Andrews, B., Brewin, C. R., Stewart, L., Philpott, R., & Hejdenberg, J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 767-777
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2073005403
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sponsor name not included (CBC/MED/0981)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, delayed-onset PTSD, military veterans, war veterans, life events, peritraumatic dissociation, anger, shame, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse, trauma exposure, stress sensitivity, stress adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anger, Combat Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Risk Factors, Shame, Social Environment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Veterans, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review