CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for individuals whose lives have been affected by cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Foley, Elizabeth, Baillie, Andrew, Huxter, Malcolm, Price, Melanie, Sinclair, Emma·2010·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0017566
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for individuals with a diagnosis of cancer. METHOD: Participants (N = 115) diagnosed with cancer, across site and stage, were randomly allocated to either the treatment or the wait-list condition. Treatment was conducted at 1 site, by a single therapist, and involved participation in 8 weekly 2-hr sessions that focused on mindfulness. Participants meditated for up to 1 hr daily and attended an additional full-day session during the course. Participants were assessed before treatment and 10 weeks later; this second assessment occurred immediately after completion of the program for the treatment condition. The treatment condition was also assessed at 3 months postintervention. All postinitial assessments were completed by assessors who were blind to treatment allocation. RESULTS: There were large and significant improvements in mindfulness (effect size [ES] = 0.55), depression (ES = 0.83), anxiety (ES = 0.59), and distress (ES = 0.53) as well as a trend for quality of life (ES = 0.30) for MBCT participants compared to those who had not received the training. The wait-list group was assessed before and after receiving the intervention and demonstrated similar change. CONCLUSIONS: These improvements represent clinically meaningful change and provide evidence for the provision of MBCT within oncology settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017566

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 268

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Foley, E., Baillie, A., Huxter, M., Price, M., & Sinclair, E.
Affiliations
Cancer Institute of New South Wales (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2010-02
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
72-79
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/a0017566
OpenAlex
W1984687952
Cited by
268
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
FWCI
28.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Institute NSW
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, cancer, depression, anxiety, psychological distress, quality of life, mindfulness meditation, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review