Cited by 186Creativity in Education and NeurosciencePsychological and Educational Research StudiesArtistic and Creative Research

Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas.

Thrash, Todd M., Maruskin, Laura A., Cassidy, Scott E., Fryer, James W., Ryan, Richard M.·2010·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Within the creativity domain, inspiration is a motivational state posited to energize the actualization of creative ideas. The authors examined the construct validity, predictive utility, and function of inspiration in the writing process. Study 1, a cross-lagged panel study, showed that getting creative ideas and being inspired are distinct and that the former precedes the latter. In Study 2, inspiration, at the between-person level, predicted the creativity of scientific writing, whereas effort predicted technical merit. Within persons, peaks in inspiration predicted peaks in creativity and troughs in technical merit. In Study 3, inspiration predicted the creativity of poetry. Consistent with its posited transmission function, inspiration mediated between creativity of the idea and creativity of the product, whereas effort, positive affect, and awe did not. Study 4 extended the Study 3 findings to fiction writing. Openness to aesthetics and positive affect predicted creativity of the idea, whereas approach temperament moderated the relation between creativity of the idea and inspiration. Inspiration predicted efficiency, productivity, and use of shorter words, indicating that inspiration not only transmits creativity but does so economically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017907

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • St. Lawrence University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
469-487
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2062336327
Cited by
186
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (SBE-0830366)
  • College of William and Mary
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
Keywords
inspiration, creative ideas, creativity, writing process, scientific writing, poetry, fiction writing, effort, positive affect, awe, productivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Creativity, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review