Cited by 330Flow Experience in Various FieldsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionSport Psychology and Performance

The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing.

de Manzano, Örjan, Theorell, Töres, Harmat, László, Ullén, Fredrik·2010·Emotion

Abstract

Expert performance is commonly accompanied by a subjective state of optimal experience called flow. Previous research has shown positive correlations between flow and quality of performance and suggests that flow may function as a reward signal that promotes practice. Here, piano playing was used as a flow-inducing behavior in order to analyze the relationship between subjective flow reports and psychophysiological measures. Professional classical pianists were asked to play a musical piece and then rate state flow. The performance was repeated five times in order to induce a variation in flow, keeping other factors constant, while recording the arterial pulse pressure waveform, respiration, head movements, and activity from the corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major facial muscles. A significant relation was found between flow and heart period, blood pressure, heart rate variability, activity of the zygomaticus major muscle, and respiratory depth. These findings are discussed in relation to current models of emotion, attention, and expertise, and flow is proposed to be a state of effortless attention, which arises through an interaction between positive affect and high attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018432

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mental state of flow may be such a combination of sympathetic and vagal influence.

    “It has been suggested that the mental state of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997) may be such a combination (De Manzano et al., 2010).”

    From Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers (2013) · cites this paper as De Manzano et al., 2010

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 330

Authors
de Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullén, F.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2010-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
301-311
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2027030315
Cited by
330
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council
  • Sällskapet Barnavård
  • Söderbergs Stiftelser
  • Freemasons in Stockholm Foundation for Children’s Welfare
  • Stockholm Brain Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
flow, piano playing, psychophysiology, heart rate variability, heart period, blood pressure, pulse pressure, respiration, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, facial muscle activity, head movement, expert performance, positive affect, attention, emotion models
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Blood Pressure, Electromyography, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Music, Psychomotor Performance, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review