Confidentiality as a barrier to social support: a cross-sectional study of Norwegian emergency and human service workers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emergency responders report stigma and privacy concerns regarding seeking care for mental health symptoms related, at least in part, to occupational stress.
“Emergency responders report stigma and privacy concerns regarding seeking care for mental health symptoms related, at least in part, to occupational stress (16, 71–74).”
From Pilot outcomes and exploration of treatment mechanisms using a culturally adapted version of the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders to improve mental health symptoms, alcohol misuse, functional outcomes, and sleep quality in emergency responders (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Løvseth, L. T., & Aasland, O. G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Stress Management
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-231
- ISSN
- 1072-5245 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3424
- OpenAlex
- W2030030272
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Stress Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Central Norway Regional Health Authority
- St. Olavs University Hospital in Trondheim
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- confidentiality, social support, emergency workers, human service workers, occupational stress, barriers to support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
